Frog Jump carries an INOUT name and sits beside Chicken Road in the same catalogue, which invites one assumption: same game, new paint. Step and cash out — verified on our own capture. We know because we captured it running, and the capture says something different from the cover art.
Also carries the heading “Frog Road” inside the studio catalogue, which tells you exactly how closely it tracks Chicken Road: a different animal on the same road.
The catalogue entry we captured on 13 August 2026 carried one line of copy: «Control in Every Jump», on the games listing. That one is worth holding onto, because our capture backs it up: this is the only title in the family that prints the multiplier on each step before you take it. The copy promised control and the interface actually delivers some.
A vertical run of lily pads, logs and flowers, each one labelled with the multiplier it adds before you jump to it: +0.05x, +0.1x, +2x. The counter read 1.05x and the button read CASHOUT $5.25 — a cash amount rather than a multiplier. Stake presets run MIN / 2 / 5 / 10 / 20 / MAX.
It tells you what each step is worth before you take it. Chicken Road does not. That single interface decision makes the trade legible in a way the flagship never bothers to.
This site used to describe every title in the catalogue as one bet in forty costumes, with a cash-out rule that carried across all of them unchanged. That was written from the names and the cover art. The captures were sitting in our own files, and reading them properly took the claim apart. Three titles, three different games.
Every step buys a bigger payout and sells part of your chance of keeping it. This is one of the titles where that description holds.
Built on the figure the studio states for this title. INOUT prints for Frog Jump, and this curve uses it rather than the 98% it prints for Chicken Road — borrowing the flagship’s number would flatter the sibling. The per-step survival chance is published nowhere, so we assume an even risk per step to show the shape. The game itself labels each step’s multiplier on screen, which is more than the flagship does.
Lily pads over water. A missed jump reads as a splash rather than a collision, which is a gentler picture of the same total loss. The risk is unchanged either way, and the presentation is doing work on your judgement that has nothing to do with the numbers.
Seeing +0.05x on the next pad makes the trade honest and makes it tempting in the same glance: a small, cheap-looking increment reads as a small, cheap risk, and it is the same risk as an unlabelled one. Read the pad two ahead, not the one in front of you.
When to press cash out. Stake size, which skin you loaded and how the last round went change nothing about the round in front of you. Decide the step before you start it, not while the multiplier is climbing.
Two titles from one studio, on the fields the studio itself fills in plus the one that matters most: whether anybody has actually looked.
| Field | Frog Jump | Chicken Road |
|---|---|---|
| Studio | INOUT Games | INOUT Games |
| Mechanic | Step and cash out — verified on our own capture | Step and cash out — the studio’s own filing |
| Stated RTP | none — page removed | 98% |
| Bet range | not published | $1 – $7 |
| Released | not published | 4 April 2024 |
| Maximum multiplier | not published | not published |
| Seen running by us | yes | yes |
| «Configurable by operator» note | not on its page | on its page |
The studio, the absence of a published ceiling, and the fact that neither game holds your money — the casino does. A return rate below 100% in both. Skill enters neither, and no sequence of past rounds tells you anything about the next.
It tells you what each step is worth before you take it. Chicken Road does not. That single interface decision makes the trade legible in a way the flagship never bothers to.
Chicken Road, if the choice is yours. It is in the catalogue, it has a stated return rate and a maintained page. Seeking out Frog Jump on the strength of a family resemblance we cannot verify is not a decision we would defend.
Games from one studio with similar names run the same mechanic underneath.
We assumed exactly that, wrote it across this site, then opened our own captures. Frog Jump steps and pays out per step. Wheel Out climbs and can halve your multiplier with a pickup. Ice Fish is a betting wheel with no steps in it at all. Three titles, three games.
Search results mix these freely, and some are not step games at all. Check the studio name on the game screen before assuming you found the one you were looking for.
The studio holds a b2b licence, which lets it sell games to casinos and does not let it take your bet. Everything below follows from that.
INOUT’s Anjouan licence — ALSI-202506032-FI2, held by IOGr B.V. — is type b2b. That covers selling software to operators. It does not permit accepting a deposit. So no INOUT app takes your money, and anything on a store calling itself the official Frog Jump app is not from the studio. Including one site we traced that impersonates the studio outright.
Our capture of Frog Jump shows ₹ and € in the live-wins ticker on two separate captures. Across the three titles in this family we captured, the ticker ran in rupees, euros and Thai baht — the same games, three currencies. The studio does not set that. The casino does, because the casino is where the account and the balance live. It is the clearest demonstration we have of who is actually holding your money.
Not for this title any more — the page it lived on is gone. Demos for the titles still in the catalogue work the same way and need no download. How to use one properly.
Decide what you are prepared to lose before the first round, and treat that as the whole session. It is the only rule on this site that does not depend on knowing how the game works — which, on this page, is exactly the point.
Frog Jump is not the Chicken Road reskin its name and its shelf position imply. It tells you what each step is worth before you take it. Chicken Road does not. That single interface decision makes the trade legible in a way the flagship never bothers to. We got this wrong on this site until we opened our own capture of the game running, which is a lesson about cover art rather than about this title. What holds either way: the return rate is the house edge doing its job, the casino rather than the studio holds your money, and no maximum win is published for anything in this catalogue.
