Pascal Gaming makes 1 of the seventy-two chicken games we have catalogued. It publishes return rate, maximum win, volatility, release date and bet range. It also states a maximum win — which INOUT, the studio behind the best-known game in this genre, does for none of its forty titles.
Read from the studio’s own catalogue rather than from an aggregator, with a control request to confirm the site really returns 404 for pages that do not exist.
Across its 1 chicken title it publishes return rate, maximum win, volatility, release date, bet range. Everything in the table below is read from the studio’s own game pages on 16 August 2026, and every blank is a field the studio leaves empty rather than one we failed to find.
A maximum win. This studio prints one, which is rarer than it should be: INOUT publishes no ceiling for any of its forty games. A return rate is a long-run average you will never observe; a ceiling is a hard limit you can check a marketing claim against.
Our first pass reported that Chicken Revenge could not be found at any of the studios we searched. A second, adversarial pass opened the page and found it: 200, with every field printed. We then verified it a third time ourselves, including a control request for an invented slug, which returns a genuine 404.
RTP 97%, maximum win 20,000, High volatility, a bet range of 0.1 to 100, and a release date of 7 July 2026, filed under Instant Games. A complete specification — the thing our first pass said did not exist.
Because the failure mode is the interesting part. «We looked and did not find it» becomes «it is not there» far too easily, and it is the error this site has now made and caught more than once. The full log.
Blank cells are fields the studio does not print. We have left them blank rather than filling them from a listing site.
| Title | Return rate | Maximum win | Volatility | Bet range | Released |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken Revenge | 97% | 20,000 | High | 0.1 – 100 | 7 July 2026 |
We read fifteen studios’ own sites for this. The result reframes something this site had been treating as a quirk.
Pascal Gaming states 20,000. That puts it with the overwhelming majority: of the fifteen studios whose chicken titles we read on their own sites, fourteen publish a maximum.
INOUT Games publishes no maximum for any of its forty titles — and INOUT makes Chicken Road, the game that accounts for more search demand than the rest of this genre combined. One studio is silent, and it is the one whose figures matter to the most people.
Because until this pass we had one counterexample and an inference. Now we have fourteen studios, read individually on their own domains, with an adversarial check over the results that threw out four collections for unverifiable numbers. «Nobody in this genre publishes a ceiling» is not a defence available to anyone.
A return rate is a long-run average you will never observe in a session. A maximum win is a hard bound you can hold a marketing claim against. That is exactly why the pages promising you a specific big number tend to be about the games where no such number is published.
| Studio | Maximum win published | Publishes a ceiling |
|---|---|---|
| Turbo Games | ×1,000,000 | yes |
| Evoplay | €750,000 | yes |
| BGaming | €250,000 – €256,000 | yes |
| Pascal Gaming | 20,000 | yes |
| SmartSoft | ×10,000 | yes |
| Million Games | ×10,000 | yes |
| Mascot Gaming | ×10,000 | yes |
| Platipus | ×10,000 | yes |
| 100HP Gaming | $10,000 | yes |
| KingMidas | ×3,138,009.6 | yes |
| Solidicon | ×2,231 | yes |
| Onlyplay | ×1,000 | yes |
| Funky Games | ×200 | yes |
| PG Soft | ×30.72 | yes |
| INOUT Games | — | no |
Every studio making these games lands somewhere between the one that publishes almost nothing and the one that publishes a hard ceiling.
INOUT Games makes the title this whole site is about. Forty games, a return rate on thirty-four of them, and a maximum win on none. Evoplay makes Uncrossable Rush: 96.00% and a stated ceiling of €750,000. Same mechanic, opposite disclosure.
Closer to Evoplay: it states a ceiling, which makes its claims checkable in a way most of this genre is not.
A casino shows you a tile and a provider label. Everything else — what the game returns, what it can pay at most, how volatile it is — comes from the studio or from nowhere. Knowing which studio publishes what tells you in advance whether the numbers on a review page could possibly have a source.
Titles are copied freely across this genre — seventy-two games, thirty-three studios, and names that collide constantly. The provider label on the tile has to be accurate, because the casino is paying for that integration. All seventy-two, grouped by studio.
They sell games to casinos. Your balance, your verification and your withdrawal sit with the operator, under the operator’s licence. Which is why this site spends more time on casinos than on studios. The operators we checked.
Seventy-two chicken games from thirty-three studios means titles collide constantly. The provider label is the part that has to be accurate.
Chicken Revenge. Check the provider label on the tile or in the game info panel — it should read Pascal Gaming.
Chicken Road, Chicken Route, Chicken Rush, Chicken Runner, Chicken Run and Chicken Roll are six different products from five different studios, and that is one syllable of variation. Several are not even the same kind of game.
Every studio here offers one. Loading it confirms the title, the studio and the interface without a stake — and it is the check that caught our own worst error, when we described three games from their cover art and two turned out to work nothing like we said.
It sells games to casinos. Your balance, your verification and your withdrawal sit with the operator under the operator’s licence, which is why this site spends more time on casinos than on studios. The operators we checked.
Pascal Gaming makes 1 of the chicken games in circulation, and the useful thing to know about it is the shape of its disclosure rather than any single number. It publishes a maximum win, which most of this genre does not, and that makes its figures checkable against the claims made about them. Whichever studio made the tile in front of you, the casino is still the party holding your money, and that is the check worth running.
