100HP Gaming makes 6 of the seventy-two chicken games we have catalogued. It publishes return rate, maximum win, volatility, release date and bet range. It also states a maximum win — which INOUT, the studio behind the best-known game in this genre, does for none of its forty titles.
Read from the studio’s own catalogue rather than from an aggregator, with a control request to confirm the site really returns 404 for pages that do not exist.
Across its 6 chicken titles it publishes return rate, maximum win, volatility, release date, bet range. Everything in the table below is read from the studio’s own game pages on 16 August 2026, and every blank is a field the studio leaves empty rather than one we failed to find.
A maximum win. This studio prints one, which is rarer than it should be: INOUT publishes no ceiling for any of its forty games. A return rate is a long-run average you will never observe; a ceiling is a hard limit you can check a marketing claim against.
On Chicken Subway the studio states that the system secretly generates a final multiplier at the start of the round, and your task is to climb toward it without passing it. That is not the Chicken Road structure, where the round ends on a failed step. It is a hidden ceiling per round, and it changes what a cash-out decision means.
The specification table says the maximum bet is $150. The FAQ lower down the same page says the maximum «is usually capped at a certain amount (e.g. $100)». We publish the table value and flag the disagreement rather than picking the friendlier one, because the studio hedging its own field is itself worth knowing.
We wrote that six titles in our registry were undocumented by this studio, Tappy Bird among them. A reader sent us a working address and Tappy Bird turned out to be running on the studio’s own demo lobby — a different domain from its marketing site, behind a session parameter we had no way to guess. We had checked one host and drawn a conclusion about the company.
A maximum win of ×62.12 printed on the track. Two difficulty levels that differ in length rather than in speed: Easy is 24 steps, Hard is 14. Stakes from $0.25. And a provably fair scheme — the round detail panel exposes a round ID, a salt and a hash, which is more verification than INOUT offers on any of its forty titles. The full page.
Six titles run in its demo lobby: Tappy Bird, Chicken Tour, Chicken Heart, Chicken Subway, Chicken Train and Chicken Pirate. Its marketing site has a sitemap of seven pages in total, and exactly two of them are chicken games — Chicken Pirate and Chicken Subway. The other four are playable and undocumented.
We had these four filed as «unknown to us». They are not unknown; they are live and unpublished. A studio can ship a game to operators and never write a specification for it, and this is what that looks like from outside.
The catalogue record for Tappy Bird carries a bets block keyed by currency — and among the currency codes sits a key called 1WIN. Under the standard configuration the maximum stake is $150 and the maximum win $10,000. Under that operator key the maximum stake is 50,000,000 and the maximum win 2,500,000,000.
We have written throughout that the operator configures the game and the studio only supplies it, resting on INOUT’s line that its return is «configurable according to operator settings». This is the same claim with the working shown: a named operator, in the developer’s own config, with limits several orders of magnitude apart from the default. It also explains why listing sites disagree with each other — they are reading different operator builds and printing the result as a property of the game.
Across all six titles: $0.10 to $150 with a maximum win of $10,000, and in rupees ₹8.50 to ₹12,500 with a ceiling of ₹850,000. The studio supports 120 currencies and 39 languages, which is a wider reach than any other studio in this survey publishes.
Chicken Wars and Chicken Champions appear in our list of seventy-two attributed to this studio. They are not on the shelf and not on the site. We are removing the attribution rather than leaving it as a quiet inaccuracy.
Six titles our registry attributes to this studio have no page on its own domain. Verified against a control request, not assumed from one missing URL.
Blank cells are fields the studio does not print. We have left them blank rather than filling them from a listing site.
live capture
| Title | Return rate | Maximum win | Volatility | Bet range | Released |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken Tour | — | $10,000 (₹850,000 in rupees) | — | $0.10 – $150 | 16 March 2026 |
| Chicken Heart | — | $10,000 (₹850,000 in rupees) | — | $0.10 – $150 | 4 March 2026 |
| Chicken Train | — | $10,000 (₹850,000 in rupees) | — | $0.10 – $150 | 6 November 2025 |
| Tappy Bird | — | $10,000 (multiplier ceiling ×62.12) | — | $0.10 – $150 | 7 July 2026 |
| Chicken Subway | 98% | $10,000 | High | $0.10 – $150 | 25 December 2025 |
| Chicken Pirate | 97% | $10,000 per round | Medium overall | $0.10 – $150 | 30 October 2025 |
We read fifteen studios’ own sites for this. The result reframes something this site had been treating as a quirk.
100HP Gaming states $10,000. That puts it with the overwhelming majority: of the fifteen studios whose chicken titles we read on their own sites, fourteen publish a maximum.
INOUT Games publishes no maximum for any of its forty titles — and INOUT makes Chicken Road, the game that accounts for more search demand than the rest of this genre combined. One studio is silent, and it is the one whose figures matter to the most people.
Because until this pass we had one counterexample and an inference. Now we have fourteen studios, read individually on their own domains, with an adversarial check over the results that threw out four collections for unverifiable numbers. «Nobody in this genre publishes a ceiling» is not a defence available to anyone.
A return rate is a long-run average you will never observe in a session. A maximum win is a hard bound you can hold a marketing claim against. That is exactly why the pages promising you a specific big number tend to be about the games where no such number is published.
| Studio | Maximum win published | Publishes a ceiling |
|---|---|---|
| Turbo Games | ×1,000,000 | yes |
| Evoplay | €750,000 | yes |
| BGaming | €250,000 – €256,000 | yes |
| Pascal Gaming | 20,000 | yes |
| SmartSoft | ×10,000 | yes |
| Million Games | ×10,000 | yes |
| Mascot Gaming | ×10,000 | yes |
| Platipus | ×10,000 | yes |
| 100HP Gaming | $10,000 | yes |
| KingMidas | ×3,138,009.6 | yes |
| Solidicon | ×2,231 | yes |
| Onlyplay | ×1,000 | yes |
| Funky Games | ×200 | yes |
| PG Soft | ×30.72 | yes |
| INOUT Games | — | no |
Every studio making these games lands somewhere between the one that publishes almost nothing and the one that publishes a hard ceiling.
INOUT Games makes the title this whole site is about. Forty games, a return rate on thirty-four of them, and a maximum win on none. Evoplay makes Uncrossable Rush: 96.00% and a stated ceiling of €750,000. Same mechanic, opposite disclosure.
Closer to Evoplay: it states a ceiling, which makes its claims checkable in a way most of this genre is not.
A casino shows you a tile and a provider label. Everything else — what the game returns, what it can pay at most, how volatile it is — comes from the studio or from nowhere. Knowing which studio publishes what tells you in advance whether the numbers on a review page could possibly have a source.
Titles are copied freely across this genre — seventy-two games, thirty-three studios, and names that collide constantly. The provider label on the tile has to be accurate, because the casino is paying for that integration. All seventy-two, grouped by studio.
They sell games to casinos. Your balance, your verification and your withdrawal sit with the operator, under the operator’s licence. Which is why this site spends more time on casinos than on studios. The operators we checked.
Seventy-two chicken games from thirty-three studios means titles collide constantly. The provider label is the part that has to be accurate.
Chicken Tour, Chicken Heart, Chicken Train, Tappy Bird, Chicken Subway, Chicken Pirate. Check the provider label on the tile or in the game info panel — it should read 100HP Gaming.
Chicken Road, Chicken Route, Chicken Rush, Chicken Runner, Chicken Run and Chicken Roll are six different products from five different studios, and that is one syllable of variation. Several are not even the same kind of game.
Every studio here offers one. Loading it confirms the title, the studio and the interface without a stake — and it is the check that caught our own worst error, when we described three games from their cover art and two turned out to work nothing like we said.
It sells games to casinos. Your balance, your verification and your withdrawal sit with the operator under the operator’s licence, which is why this site spends more time on casinos than on studios. The operators we checked.
100HP Gaming makes 6 of the chicken games in circulation, and the useful thing to know about it is the shape of its disclosure rather than any single number. It publishes a maximum win, which most of this genre does not, and that makes its figures checkable against the claims made about them. Whichever studio made the tile in front of you, the casino is still the party holding your money, and that is the check worth running.
